Pages

.

Fangirl February: Fullmetal Alchemist 2003 Review


Video Version:

Ever since I’ve started watching anime, I’ve always had a fear of rewatching my favorite shows, the reason being I’m afraid that I won’t like the show nearly as much as I did during my first viewing. For example, the first time I watched Sankarea, I really loved it. I thought it was a fantastic romance story that had some problems, but I was willing enough to forgive the anime for them. The second time I watched it, however, I was surprised by how much I didn’t like it. The small issues that I forgave earlier were suddenly unbearable, and I was almost unable to stomach the clichés. Not to mention the annoying and downright mood-breaking fanservice in this show, making it worse. Of course, this isn’t always the case. I recently rewatched My Teen Romantic Comedy SNAFU, and that second viewing just reminded me of how much I loved the show. So, when I came up with the idea of Fangirl February, I decided to also test myself to see how much my tastes have actually changed. I was prepared to watch my favorite anime movie and show, and accept that maybe they weren’t worthy of being favorites. However, that didn’t happen. My second viewing of The Disappearance of Haruhi Suzumiya proved that I still loved the movie, and allowed me to realize just why I liked it so much. The same happened during my rewatch of Fullmetal Alchemist 2003. Going in with a more critical mindset, I did find some problems with it, but I also gained much more of an appreciation for how good it was, and I can safely say that it’s still my favorite anime of all time. Sit back, relax, and read on as I complete Fangirl February with my review of Fullmetal Alchemist 2003. Be aware that there may be slight spoilers, but nothing too major will be given away.
Story:
I’m going to try not to waste your time with a plot synopsis that you’ve probably heard a million times beforehand, but on the off chance that you’ve never heard of Fullmetal Alchemist, well, here’s the basic story. Two brothers named Edward and Alphonse Elric live in a fictional country called Amestris, and have unfortunately lost their mother when they were very young. However, the two are rising alchemists, so when they feel they’ve learned enough, they try to bring her back using human transmutation, a forbidden practice since basically no one has survived this transaction. This results in Ed losing his right leg, and Al losing his entire body. A desperate Ed attaches Al’s soul to a nearby suit of armor, and loses his right arm in turn. As a result, Alphonse is basically a walking suit of armor, and half of Ed’s limbs are now made of metal, thanks to a couple automail mechanics they happen to know. However, the boys are determined to fix their mistake and get their bodies back, and so they begin their journey to search for the philosopher’s stone, a device said to defy all the laws of alchemy, especially the one about equivalent exchange. This is where the story begins, and what a great story this is. I’ve mentioned this in an earlier video about Akiyuki Shimbo, but the best way to start a story is by utilizing something simple that the audience can understand. In this case, you want the brothers to find the philosopher’s stone in order to regain their bodies, and the show does a great job in getting you invested. This allows for other story elements to build gradually, without confusing the viewer with too much information at the beginning. Though, I do think that the main topic to discuss here is the fact that FMA 2003 deviates from the manga, and how this has angered a good portion of the anime community. In other words, so many people claim that Brotherhood is better solely because it follows the manga. And, when compared, I do kind of see where people are coming from. Brotherhood’s story is more linear, has slightly better pacing, and gets a lot more done than FMA 2003 in terms of battles and the addition of new characters. But, this isn’t a review of Brotherhood, and I never intended it to be. This is a review of the original, and here’s why I think it’s more appealing to me. I’ve always liked anime and books that are focused more on characterization and character development, because, like I’ve said many times, if you don’t care about the characters, then why should you care about what happens in the story? An anime can have one of the blandest and clichéd stories I’ve ever seen, but so long as I like the characters, then I’ll continue watching. This is what FMA 2003 excels at: characters. The so-called “filler” episodes aren’t just there to fill time, they’re there to assist Edward and Alphonse’s development as characters, and to tie into the central theme of the show: that life isn’t fair. Equivalent exchange is not much of reality when you’re shown all this unfairness to the people in Amestris, and in other places, now is it? So why continue to believe it? Heck, this exact question is asked to Edward in the final few episodes! The answer, however, is one you have to answer yourself. Will you give up on all your hard work because of your cynicism, or remain optimistic and pursue your dreams even further? That depends on you. Not to mention all of the brilliant foreshadowing in this show. I heard that, during the production of FMA 2003, the mangaka herself wanted Studio Bones to create their own ending, and it shows, since even scenes that happened in Brotherhood foreshadow later events For example, say, when Edward and Alphonse are on the island for the second time in episode 28, they find footprints. I’m paraphrasing here, but Al says something like, “Hey, Ed, are those your handprints in the sand?” And Ed responds, “No, mine are automail.” But, then they find a certain anime original character. Those who’ve seen the show know exactly whom I’m talking about, and I’m betting that you didn’t notice that quip of dialogue, at least not on your first viewing. And that’s not the only one, but the others would kind of spoil the story if I specifically point them out, and I don’t want to ruin the fun. If I had to nitpick somewhat, I guess that the pacing can be a bit slow at times, but it never really got to the point where I was sitting there waiting for something to happen. Overall, the story is very well foreshadowed, paced, and thoroughly thought-out down to the very last necessary detail, and is one of the best stories in anime in my opinion.
The show follows Edward and Alphonse Elric as they search for the Philosopher's Stone
Characters:
Like I stated earlier, this anime excels in the character department, to the point where this is one of the few anime that I’d give this show a straight 10/10 to this show in the character department. Basically every character in this show serves some purpose in the story, whether it’s to develop the theme or the characters or enhance the world building, and yes, this does apply to the characters that only show up once or twice. Though, I should probably stop ignoring the elephant in the room and discuss the Elric brothers. Firstly, there’s Edward Elric. Ed and Roy Mustang are pretty much the choice favorites of the fans of this franchise, but for me personally, Ed is my favorite character in the entire show and is one of my favorite characters of all time. In fact, if I never watched SNAFU, the character review for my favorite male character would’ve been about Edward Elric. While I don’t want to spend too much time on him, since there are other characters I do want to cover, I will say that he is one of the most realistic shonen characters in anime. Something that the shonen genre suffers from is that the protagonists normally fall under two archetypes: The bland self-insert with no discernable personality or development outside of him just being a nice guy, or the edgemaster who’s super edgy and dark and brooding and thirsty for revenge and is reckless and defies the social norms. But, on the inside, he’s a nice guy who cares about those close to him. Also, did I mention he was edgy? Edward is none of those. Okay, that’s kind of a lie; technically, he’s a variation of the second option, but honestly, that’s a massive stretch. Edward is rather moody, cynical, and has a short temper (HAH), but none of these traits are portrayed as over-the-top or even really emphasized. Well, except when you call him short, but that’s for comedic effect. I think what makes Edward stand out, though, is his relationship with his brother, Alphonse. Ed is the best older sibling in anime, no questions asked, and it is shown that he’d do anything for his brother’s safety. This character trait makes Edward grow up quickly, and because of this is rather mature for a fifteen year old. Though, like the show points out, Ed still has a lot to learn about the world, and that’s the seed of his character development in this version. Though, the amazing part of his development is that, even though parts of Ed have changed, he still feels like Edward Elric at the end of the show, which is a pretty big feat of writing. Next, there’s Al, who is also a really good character. He’s very naïve and innocent, but has a heart of gold and isn’t scared of questioning his brother’s judgment. His naivety is probably a result of Edward’s over-protectiveness, as Ed tries his best to shield Al from the harshness of the world. And, Ed’s not the only older brother to do this; remember the Ishbalan children, Leo and Rick? Leo is a mature older brother who’d do anything to protect Rick since there’s no one else there to look out for him, and as a result, Rick is more caring, trusting, and naïve. And, what about the fake Elric brothers, Russell and Fletcher? Russell is an older brother who’s focused on accomplishing his goal no matter the consequences, while Fletcher is more innocent and ready to sympathize with the real Elric brothers. In other words, each brother balances out the other, with the older brother being more protective and reckless and the younger brother being more sensible and innocent. These pairs of brothers reflect the relationship between Ed and Al, to show how there are people similar to them in the world working to achieve their goals. And this is only a taste of the ingenious characters in this show that I haven’t mentioned yet. Roy Mustang, Maes Hughes, Winry Rockbell, Riza Hawkeye, Alex Louis Armstrong, Furor Bradley, Hoenhiem of Light, Dante, and the homunculi that I can’t even talk about because of spoilers are all great in their own right. The only character I would consider to be somewhat bad would probably be Lt. Archer. He’s pretty underdeveloped in comparison to the rest of the cast. But, he’s my only real problem with the characters. Overall, this is one of the best casts of characters in anime.
The characters of FMA
Presentation:
The esteemed Studio Bones produced Fullmetal Alchemist in 2003, and for its time, the animation is rather impressive. There’s never any huge drop in quality, but when it looks good, it actually looks better than most anime coming out today. However, it is design and coloring that this anime really nails. The colors like to lean towards desert colors, like sand-yellow and light brown, with some blues here and there. This gives the anime a gritty atmosphere, which, might I add, is also great. The backgrounds and general settings all look nice, which is a plus. I also really like the character designs. They’re all memorable, even the side characters. It’s very distinctly Fullmetal Alchemist, though I do see the resemblance in the artist’s other works like Silver Spoon and The Heroic Legend of Arslan…at least, in the images I’ve seen. I need to watch Silver Spoon, and The Heroic Legend of Arslan doesn’t really exist yet…anyway, back to FMA. The soundtrack is awesome. Each piece helps set the atmosphere perfectly, with either ominous, ethereal, or playful tones. My personal favorites are Philosopher’s Stone, Brothers, and Dante’s Theme. Then, there’s the English dub. I’m sure that the Japanese version is more accurate and better acting and whatever, but I love the English dub of FMA. I think the main reason is Vic Migona’s performance as Edward Elric, which is probably one of the best English performances in any animated project period, including major American animated films. Even if you don’t like English dubs, I’d say give it a shot, but if you don’t like it, just go with the sub I suppose.
For its time especially, the animation is great (looks slightly grainy because of the gif though)
Why It’s Featured in Fangirl February:
Fullmetal Alchemist 2003 is my favorite anime of all time for many, many reasons. Superficially, it’s because nearly every aspect is pretty much perfect. It has a story that keeps you hooked and emotionally involved. It has main characters that you get attached to easily, and side characters that are just as likable. Its presentation is fantastic, especially for the time period, with consistent animation and a phenomenal soundtrack. But, a whole ton of anime are like that, so what makes FMA so special? Well, it’s because of how human the show is. There is a lot of moral ambiguity, and nothing within the show is black and white. Every character has a motive, and even if their actions are downright despicable, you can understand why. This is all because of the anime’s focus on the characters and not on having a huge epic story like Brotherhood did. 2003 feels more down to earth and simple, with enough leeway to flesh out the characters without feeling too slow. This is the show that made me realize how important characters are in any story, because without good characters, you don’t care about what’s going to happen to them in the story, therefore depriving the story of any tension or suspense whatsoever. 2003 made that clear through its storytelling and emphasis on character, because without me being able to understand these characters, most of the conflicts in the story would feel hollow and manipulative instead of exciting and suspenseful. Just like how Needless showed me how characters can absolutely ruin a show by being stupid, unreletable, and obnoxious, FMA showed me how characters are the link between the piece of entertainment and the audience, and that the quality of their development and characterization is truly what makes an anime fantastic. And for that, I’m eternally grateful.
Conclusion:

Overall, Fullmetal Alchemist 2003 is my favorite anime of all time for what I believe to be good reasons. The story is great from basically any angle, the characters are some of the best in anime, and the presentation is really good, especially for its time. I give Fullmetal Alchemist 2003 a straight 10/10. No scorecard, just a 10/10. I know that objectively, it should get slightly less, but from a subjective standpoint, it’s the best of the best for me, and it deserves the best rating possible. And, with that, Fangirl February comes to a close. I hope you enjoyed this second installment in my February Specials series! I sure had fun doing it, despite it being delayed on multiple occasions. I’ll see you all in my next review, which will be on...something. Until then!
reade more... Résuméabuiyad

Book Review: We Were Liars by E. Lockhart

Hey, I’m back with a book review! Haven’t done one of these in a while. Hope you enjoy!
Realistic fiction and I have had a pretty solid relationship, so I find it kind of shocking that I spend most of my time reading fantasy or science fiction. For one, most of the really good books I read are realistic fiction, like Looking For Alaska, Hoot, A Fleeting State of Mind, or The Sisterhood of the Travelling Pants. I guess my main problem with the genre is that the premises are normally too mundane and there’s always a very heavy risk of boredom. Yeah, there’s always a risk of boredom with any book you may pick up, but unless a book in the realistic fiction genre is somehow able to captivate me with interesting characters or themes, then it’s basically dead upon arrival. Though, on the other hand, at least it’s more tolerable than a boring book about zombies, gunfights, and killer robots, since you didn’t expect something awesome, right? Ah, it always boils down to expectations, doesn’t it? And when someone hypes a realistic fiction book up as the best book of 2014, then don’t your expectations get warped enough that you’ll willingly check it out? That book is the topic of today’s review: We Were Liars. Does this book manage to provide an unforgettable experience like every great realistic fiction novel should, or does it trip over its own feet and not deserve the title of “Best Young Adult Novel of 2014?” Sit back, relax, and read on as I review We Were Liars by E. Lockhart.
The Setup:
Cadence Sinclair Eastman is 18 years old, and is the heir to the head of the prestigious Sinclair Family, a prominent and wealthy lineage in the United States. However, she suffers amnesia due to an accident two years ago at her summer home, and now her main goal is to learn what actually happened to her. The details of her accident are sketchy at best, and her family refuses to tell her anything. So, over the summer, she goes to her summer home to see her extended family, in an attempt to discover what actually happened two years ago. From there, a tale of love, tragedy, mystery, and corruption unfolds.
The Characters:
What’s interesting about the main character, and most of the other characters for that matter, is how she feels both alien and human at the same time. It’s strange; on one hand, she’s relatable and complex, but on the other hand, I felt so distant from her problems and conflicts. However, this isn’t a bad aspect at all; let me explain. Cadence’s goal to discover what happened to her is understandable, but the way she talks about it and goes about solving the issue is roundabout at best. In fact, she doesn’t seem incredibly concerned by it most of the time, which confused me. Was she just used to not getting any answers? Is she just indifferent now? Is she normally this lackadaisical? Why isn’t there a sense of urgency? I guess you could say that her lack of motivation is due to her brain trauma, but at the same time, I guess no one in her family was eager to tell her what happened, so maybe it’s just her environment affecting her. Whenever she does ask, she gets vague and unspecific answers, since the doctors told her family that her memories will come back to her naturally. It’s a display of how environment can change psychology and thoughts, maybe, which plays into the themes of the novel nicely. So, what did that long paragraph of me rambling over questions and trying to come to a conclusion have to do with anything? Well, that’s what this book does incredibly well: making you think. All of the decisions that the characters make affect another character either physically, mentally, or both, making these characters feel less like hardened sculptures but more like wet clay that just keeps on getting rebuilt and rebuilt, using different colors and styles taken from others. Each character tries to remodel another character by ordering them to do something, or suggesting different ideas that could change their lives. All this culminates into everyone trying to accommodate each other’s needs, leading to stress and anguish, eventually resulting in a tragic conclusion that everyone is trying to recover from. What alienates these characters, however, is how robotic some of these decisions seem in order to accomplish what that character wants, which is what leads to the tragedy in the first place. For example, Cadence’s mother wants to keep her nice house, so she forces Cadence to kiss up to her grandfather over things Cadence doesn’t care for in the slightest. It makes you think: what good mother would force her daughter to lie to gain a materialistic end? It’s all these that stresses out Cadence and her cousins Mirren, Johnny, and her friend Gat, leading to what can only be described as a disaster. This novel’s character development is also great, though not in the traditional way. The side characters do their jobs, but outside of the mains and their mothers, no one really stands out.
The Story:
Of course, this novel depicts how Cadence discovers how corrupt and defunct her family truly is, but it’s not without its fair share of side stories and filler. I did not like how the story meandered into random side plots that felt really unnecessary in the long run. Then there’s the pacing, which is rather inconsistent. There were some parts where I wanted to throw my book against the wall because the story was moving too slowly, and other times I had trouble processing what was happening. Though, the latter only happened once, and that was near the end. In the beginning, the book appeared to literally have no direction or plot, which makes for a bad first impression. As the story went on, however, I started to get more invested, because if there’s anything the book’s good at, it’s the mystery aspect. I honestly had no idea where the story would take me, and all my predictions were completely incorrect. The themes about greed and racism are also done pretty well, which I didn’t expect. Overall, while the story does have its problems, I did enjoy reading the book, and the ending is exceptional.
The Writing Style/Grammatical Errors:
The imagery in this book is stunning and is also very shocking. This book seems to like using blood metaphors, which caught me off guard on more than one occasion. For example, something would happen, and then Cadence would describe some sort of major injury, which made me think, “Why aren’t you DOING something to help yourself?! Does no one around you notice that you’re bleeding to death!?” As it turns out, it just represents pain. The book also sometimes uses a structure similar to what you would see in poetry, which was slightly unneeded, but it still fit somewhat. There were no grammatical errors to be found.
Final Judgment:
Overall, We Were Liars is a pretty good read. However, I do think that your enjoyment of it depends on whether you like the ending or not. For me, I loved the ending, and thought that the buildup and characters were great. But, I can see why others would dismiss this book for that very same reason. I give We Were Liars a 3.75 out of 5, and a recommendation to check it out. But, like always, it’s up to you to decide your own opinions.
ScoreCard:

reade more... Résuméabuiyad

Fangirl February: Shiki Ryougi Character Review


Video Version:
Introduction:
One of the sadder parts of watching anime is how, even though they are typically more common than male characters, it is very hard to find an interesting and unique female character. In most shows, they tend to fall under the typical archetypes of the tsundere, the yandere, the kuudere, the dandere, and so on, and while characters within these archetypes aren’t necessarily bad or unentertaining, they’re still stereotypical characters. Sure, you’ve got standout shows with awesome female characters like in Kill la Kill or Yona of the Dawn, but even so, most females are whiny, annoying, and uninteresting. So, when I do come across an anime that seemingly sports remarkable and unique female characters, I will automatically be interested in the show, even if it turns out terribly. That’s where Kara no Kyoukai, or Garden of Sinners in English, comes in. Probably my favorite movie series of all time, it has many interesting and tragic characters to analyze and talk about, but for my favorite female character in anime, I’ve chosen Shiki Ryougi, the main female lead. What makes her so special that she stands out among the crowd? Well, sit back, relax, and read on as I explain why in the third installment of Fangirl February. Keep in mind that I am basically going to spoil the entire series in this video, so if you haven’t seen Kara no Kyoukai yet, please do so before watching this. If you’ve seen it or haven't and just don’t care, let’s get started.
General Character Overview:
As stated earlier, Shiki Ryougi is the main female lead of the Kara no Kyoukai franchise, a series of seven movies animated by Unlimited Budget Works coughI mean ufotable. The series is based off of light novels written by the same guy behind the Fate visual novels; in other words, it is Type-Moon property. And, at least in my opinion, Kara no Kyoukai is leagues ahead of Fate/Stay Night in nearly every way. Fate/Zero is another story, but that's another topic for another time. Kara no Kyoukai is not limited to the typical visual novel structure, and it shows through its narrative and experimentation with theme. Many ideas are displayed and discussed in the movies that are thought provoking, but a downside is that the movies have questionable dialogue and too much they wanted to discuss, which is its main problem. The movies focus too much on ideas and concepts that are out of its reach, causing many people to call the series “pretentious”. And, I would be inclined to agree, if not for the seventh movie. By now, you’re probably thinking, “What the heck does this have to do with Shiki Ryougi?” To answer your question, it has everything to do with Shiki Ryougi. For the first six movies, Shiki is a mystery, and nothing about her really makes any sense. At times, it felt like her characterization was lost due to the endless discussion of inane topics and no display of her own interests or desires. In the second movie, which is her first chronological appearance, she’s shown to have two personalities: Shiki, who is distant, cold, and emotionless, and SHIKI, who is fun loving but has an incurable bloodlust. At the end of the second movie, SHIKI tries to kill Mikiya (the main character of the movies), but is hit by a car. In the fourth movie, which comes next chronologically, it is implied that SHIKI has been killed due to the car accident, leaving the first personality alone. The third movie shows that, however, the remaining Shiki is still violent and bloodthirsty, which, at least, lead me to believe that SHIKI definitely left a negative impression on the current Shiki. In the fifth movie, we learn that there are mages who specialize in bringing out the darkness in humans, and it is shown that Shiki was involved in this somehow, as the mages are trying to bring out the evil side of Shiki once again. Something to take note of is that, in all of the movies, the opponents were originally normal human beings who went on violent rampages once they encountered a mage. Then, the seventh movie happens. We learn that Shiki was involved with the mages, and that Shiki’s bloodlust has been partially cured by Mikiya. In order to keep Shiki violent, the mage Arya uses the obsessive Lio to bring Shiki back. This leads us to the most important part of the movie: watching Shiki become more human because of Mikiya’s influence. When Shiki and Mikiya are talking over the phone, they are arguing over whether Shiki should kill Lio, with Mikiya stating that he won’t forgive her if she does. This ties into both of their progressions as characters: Shiki becoming less of a monster, and Mikiya learning the harsh reality of our world. Later on, Lio nearly kills Mikiya, and Shiki, thinking Mikiya is dead, kills Lio. However, when the two finally reunite, Mikiya says, “I forgive you.” In other words, Mikiya accepts that not everything can be solved peacefully. The entire message of the movie is to learn how to compromise, because there are no issues that are completely good or evil. All of the characters Shiki defeated earlier had some sort of emotional baggage or were innocent victims, but because of their destructive nature, they needed to be stopped. Shiki is different, however, because of her attachment to Mikiya; he is what makes her human.

Why She’s Featured in Fangirl February:
Shiki Ryougi is a very special character to me, and not because I can relate to her on a personal level. Yeah, it’s kind of hard to sympathize with someone who is essentially a psychopath, and admittedly she isn’t the most complex female character I’ve ever come across. But, much like with the movie series she comes from, I don’t really mind. I love how Shiki is different, interesting, and so unlike any other character in composure and conflict. She has to fight so many people that are trying to turn her into a monster, and uses her own methods to do so. Even when Mikiya doesn’t agree with her, she still goes off and does what she thinks is right, even if her view falls into a moral grey area. Sure, technically she’s killing hapless victims, but each person was so ravaged, broken, and depressed that maybe they were better off. It’s kind of like the morally grey ending of Million Dollar Baby, or the actions of Don Vito in The Godfather, or the entirety of Mystic River. This is how themes are presented to the audience: through character personalities and their interactions with others. I’m not saying that I necessarily agree with this ideas, by the way; I’m just trying to say what I believe the movies are trying to convey through its characters. I’ve gone on and on throughout my career as a reviewer about the definition of pretentious, calling Psycho-Pass pretentious, Code-Breaker pretentious, Sword Art Online 2 pretentious, and so on, but pretentious is something Kara no Kyoukai is not, for the most part. The ideas it tries to convey are all tied in somehow, with Shiki being the perfect example of this. Her development reflects these ideas of morality, with Mikiya’s character being the juxtaposition, with his naïve mentality. On top of that, she’s also pretty awesome. Like I said in my introduction, it’s really refreshing to see a strong and female character like Shiki, since most are pretty archetypal and weak, unfortunately. So, that’s why I like her so much: she’s unique, conveys interesting ideas throughout the series, and is very fun to watch.

So, I hope you enjoyed the third installment of Fangirl February! I’ll see you all next time for the final installment: the Fullmetal Alchemist 2003 review. Until then!
reade more... Résuméabuiyad